7 Best canon lens for portraits and wedding photography: (2021 Guide & Reviews)

So, this past couple of weeks has just been pretty much shooting weddings left and right like a back-to-back wedding. You can pretty much say a wedding galore.

So, today I want to talk about the lenses that I use for weddings.

What lenses work for me at the weddings that I shoot at.

And recommend my favorite 7 best canon lenses for portraits and wedding photography to you.

So let’s go ahead and get started.

Which is the best Canon lens for portraits and wedding photography?

Here are my recommended top 7 best Canon lens for portraits and wedding photography:-

What is the best Canon lens for family portraits?

Canon 50mm 1.2: (What lens do professional photographers use)

I am a wedding photographer primarily, but I also shoot portraits and fashion, and many other things.

The 50-millimeter lens is by far my most used lens.

If you are looking to buy a prime lens and you don’t know what to buy first, this is absolutely the one you should buy now.

50-millimeter lens can be used for almost everything.

Here’s what you can shoot with a 50-millimeter lens, Number one that you can shoot portraits.

The 50-millimeter lens is great for portraits of individual people and couples, mostly when I’m shooting on a wedding day.

You can get in close, you can back up, you can get the full length, you can get three quarters, and you can even get just beautiful face shots with a 50-millimeter lens.

You don’t have to stick with just individual and couple portraits with the 50.

You can also shoot groups when I’m shooting family photos, or at the church or in a park; I like to use a 50-millimeter lens to add a bit of compression.

I can get many people in the photo in a somewhat tight space, but it makes them look more together when you’re using a 50-millimeter lens versus a 35 or 24.

A 50 is also great for shooting details, shoot details of a tablescape, shoot details of invitation, shoes, even jewelry, and some kind of life.

The 50 is my go-to for all of my morning prep pictures, all my detail pictures in the morning, as well as all of my reception pictures at night.

I shoot nighttime photos and the roofscapes with a 50 millimeter.

When you’re using a prime lens which means that it’s a fixed focal length, in other words, you can’t zoom in or out.

It seems like something tedious, but you can always do your feet right, go closer and further away.

It seems more work but trusts me; you’re going to get a much more crisp image out of a prime lens, typically versus a zoom lens.

Another great thing about a prime lens is that it has a shallow aperture in most cases; this gives you a more shallow field gives you that nice soft dreamy background beautiful bokeh.

And it also lets you draw the viewer’s attention to a certain point of focus.

Now, this can make it a little bit more difficult to focus, but prime lenses are usually the ability to focus faster.

If you purchase your brand’s top-end prime lens, it’s usually a very fast-focusing lens.

The 50 millimeter, at least in the Canon line, is probably one of the fastest focusing lenses in the lineup.

Which is another reason I like to use it because I can focus very quickly during a family photo session, and it’s not difficult to photograph at night.

Overall, the 50-millimeter lens is super versatile. You can use it pretty much for anything.

If I had one lens to take with me on a wedding day and I couldn’t have anything else, I use a 50 millimeter.CANON 50MM 1.2: (Best Portrait lens for wedding photography Canon)

Pros
  • Super-versatile lens
  • Fast bright aperture
  • Fastest focusing lens
  • Less distortion
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Dust & splash protection
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Some vignette

What Canon lens do professional photographers use?

Canon 24-70 F2.8: (Best Professional lens for wedding photography Canon)

What is the best lens for wedding photography?

I started a few years ago as a wedding photographer, and it took me a lot of time and research to choose the best lens.

After a while, I came up with the conclusion, and I have never regretted it.

The 24 to 70 millimeters is the best range for wedding photography.

I’m usually using the 24 to 70 Canon 2.8 L series USM ultrasonic Moto.

The range will be wide enough for covering group shorts or narrow enough if you want to do a portrait from the 24 focal distance, which is the wider, to the 70, which is already could also be classified as a telephoto.

So the 70 will give you a nice blurry background, depending on where you’re shooting from or where the subject is.

So in my personal opinion, 24 to 70 is the way to go.

My first 10 weddings have, I had only this lens. I didn’t have the second camera; I didn’t have a telephoto, I didn’t have a macro, I didn’t have anything else.

This is good enough to help you start your wedding photography business and is good enough to shoot all day long.

I shoot 80 to 90% of the time with this one, and the other 10% I’m using the telephoto lens on the second camera.

I just want to tell you; it is wide enough and good enough and sharp enough to cover the whole wedding.

It can focus very accurately; it has manual and automatic focus it does have a hood.

It’s built to impress people, I can assure you, sometimes size and appearances do matter, people are always looking at me said, you have a big camera, and I will say yes because I’m supposed to be a professional when using this 24, it does extend a little bit.

This is the sharpest lens I have got; I was amazed by purchasing the other lens because every time I can see the images taken with this lens.

Everything is sharper is like my eyesight is coming back; you would expect that all the good quality L series lenses from Canon are 100 percent sharp.

This is the sharpest every time I’m looking at it; I’m so happy, I’ve got it, and I recommend this lens without any hesitation.

This is a must-have for every serious photographer, including wedding photography.

(Best Professional lens for wedding photography Canon)

Pros
  • Versatile lens.
  • Fast aperture.
  • Superb low light performance.
  • Solid build quality.
  • Weather sealed.
  • Excellent sharp image quality.
  • Autofocus motor is fast & accurate.
  • No visible chromatic aberration.
Cons
  • Big & heavy.
  • Bit Pricey.
  • Some distortion.
  • No image stabilization.

Canon 24-105mm F4: (Best Selling lens for wedding photography Canon)

My thoughts on it, I’ll tell you some of the specs and some of the downsides of this, but let me tell you why this is probably one of the most popular wedding lenses event lenses on the market.

This is actually pretty much one of the top-selling because it’s a very versatile range for what it is, and it’s just an F4 is a pretty decent range for whatever you need to do in most situations.

Now in low light or if you need a little bit more bokeh or compression, of course, 2.8 would be a little bit better, but for f4, It’s not that bad, especially for 999 bucks, not bad.

Some of the cool things are that it does have a range of F4 to F 22, so you get that great depth.

It has 3 aspherical elements, which are fantastic as well that are also weather sealed.

This does have optical image stabilization built onto the lens with an ultrasonic motor.

The bokeh on this thing is phenomenal, and that’s because it has 8 blades in and 13 groups that you do get decent bokeh, and you can really see, blurs out the background very well.

It is even lighter than the 24 to 70 2.8, a Canon and Nikon by almost maybe two or three pounds it’s 1.47 pounds, without anything on.

There are 2 or 3 major drawbacks that I will say about this lens since we got through mainly all the important stuff.

One of my main gripes about the 24 to 105 is that it does have a little bit of lens creep, so just be careful of that and maybe have a little bit of lens hood around it so that way you can protect it.

But besides that, the autofocusing is a little bit slow and clunky. The stabilization will be a bit loud.

That’s just how the lens is built, and I didn’t notice that the autofocusing does hunt a lot more, and maybe we’ll find it a little bit difficult of a time grabbing something.

But let me tell you when this works, this works phenomenally, and I’d say because of what it offers the lens range.

The constant F4 you can use in the light fantastic of flash will be one of the most popular wedding lenses.

I think it’s a phenomenal lens; you can easily get a fantastic quality that you can use with your full-frame camera. We use it with your crop camera as well.

But I just think that for that price range as well, you’re getting a hell of a lot out of it.

The image quality is actually fantastic; you can get out a little bit of the clunkiness of the lens.

I think it’s a fantastic lens despite some of its downsides, it does exactly what you need, and the quality is just phenomenal, and it looks amazing, so don’t be afraid of buying it a thousand bucks.

It’s a pretty decent buy, especially if you’re a Canon shooter.

Canon 24-105mm F4: (Best Selling lens for wedding photography Canon)

Pros
  • Nice zoom range.
  • Fixed maximum aperture.
  • Solid build quality.
  • Excellent sharpness.
  • Optical stabilization.
  • Pleasing bokeh.
  • Lightweight.
Cons
  • Noticeable distortion and vignette.
  • Bit of flare.

Canon 70-200mm F2.8: (Best Telephoto lens for wedding photography Canon)

This lens I’ve been using since 2011 to photograph over 250 weddings. This is the Canon 70 to 200 f 2.8 l is version two.

My second most favorite lens is the Canon 70 to 200, and when I say that, I mean the L version.

Those times that you’re photographing in low light like inside a church, near sunset or around that late afternoon or early evening basically when it’s getting dark, your lens, your photos will thank you your couples were very much appreciated having the 2.8 aperture.

Let me share with you exactly why I love this lens there are quite a few reasons as I’m talking about this.

The quality of the images that I’m still getting. So yes, after 12 years of using this line of lenses and specifically the mark two version I’ve been using since 2011.

So Reason number one, the quality of the image is just amazing.

The specially for a zoom slash telephoto lens is it as sharp and, for that matter, and light as the telephoto primes versus the zooms.

The 70-200, it’s still an amazing quality lens, the contrast of the colors, not to mention how well it focuses.

All of those things make this; I feel a must-have when photographing a wedding, so Reason number one, quite simply, the image quality.

I’ve been using this forever because the 70 to 200 is a fixed aperture throughout all focal lengths.

My third reason why I recommend the 70 to 200 touched upon this already, but that is having a really effective popular range of focal length, going from a 70 millimeter to a 200 millimeter.

Now obviously, you’re not going to get wide-angle shots with this lens; it’s a telephoto lens.

With the 70-200 telephotos, you’re going to get that shallow depth of feel in the background that blurry background.

The subject will be much more just flattering because there’s more compression between the subject and the background, less distortion around the frames, and so forth.

So basically, your couples are going to thank you because they’re going to look not only realistic, but with a telephoto lens, especially if you’re shooting closer to the 200 millimeters, they’re going to look a little bit more if you know what I mean a little more flattering versus using a wide-angle lens.

So that’s the great thing, and you can shoot anything from ceremony reception from a distance, and this is a must-have I feel at certain settings, certain situations inside a Catholic Church, or if you’re photographing the toes.

During a reception, ballroom, banquet, and you don’t want to be in the way of the toaster, the couple of videographers that can step back, shoot with a 70 to 200.

It’s also a bit less intimidating, although it seems pretty intimidating, to couples, especially if you’re doing an engagement session and you’re just starting.

You don’t want to be in their face right off the bat; rather, with a 70 to 200.

With the versatility of the variety from 70 to 200, you’re going to be able to cover all sorts of situations. People object shots on the wedding day.

My fifth reason for recommending the Canon 7200 f 2.8 IS is those last two letters.

I asked for image stabilization, like inside that Catholic church or nighttime at a dark in dim-lit reception is anywhere where you’re going to need the extra stop of light, and even 2.8 aperture is not fast enough, having image stabilization will be absolutely critical.

Even in low light conditions that are still sharp and just overall looks good, so Reason number five, image stabilization.

The quality is still amazing, and sure it is a bit heavy; I don’t know what it is, maybe five-six pounds or so, maybe a little bit more, but I don’t mind that it gives me a good workout at a wedding.

Overall, I have no desire interest to switch to any other brands. I’m sure they’re wonderful, but canon has been amazing to me for all these years.

That’s why I continue to utilize them, so on that note, of course, without a doubt.

Do I recommend the Canon 70-200 F 2.8 IS L mark 2? Absolutely, yes, without a doubt.

CANON 70-200 F2.8: (Best Telephoto lens for wedding photography Canon)

Pros
  • Weather sealed.
  • Dust & moisture resistance.
  • The focus aperture ring is really smooth.
  • Solid build quality.
  • Excellent sharpness.
  • Great optical quality.
  • Focus is fast & accurate.
Cons
  • Some distortion.
  • Big & Heavyweight.
  • Bit Pricey.

Canon 16-35mm F2.8: (Best wide-angle lens for wedding photography Canon)

I will be talking about the most affordable lens you can get for ultra-wide shots, and that is the Canon 16 to 35 F 2.8.

This is the mark two version, this is the older version, and that’s exactly why I’m going to be recommending it. The price of this lens has dropped down so much over the past few years, and the quality of the lens has not changed at all.

This is still an L series glass which means it’s canon top of the line, and when I pair it with my Canon EOSR, it grants me some beautiful images.

The F 2.8 aperture with the full-frame sensor gives me extremely blurry backgrounds, making it great in low light.

As well as the fact that it can go down to a 2.8 aperture, which means it lets in a lot of lights, but it’s amazing for darker situations and creating more cinematic images.

In terms of size and weight, it’s actually not that big.

So this lens is amazing for what it is; it’s extremely sharp.

You have now the autofocus speeds on this is lightning fast paired with the Canon EOS R; it’s just, overall, my favorite lens, and it’s pretty much the only lens I keep on my camera.

Now in terms of drawbacks, there are some things that I don’t really like about this lens.

One is, although the autofocus speed is rapid.

It does make quite a bit of noise, and on the vlog, sometimes you can hear a little bit of that mechanical movement of the elements moving inside the lens, and it can get a little bit loud sometimes.

But usually, if I’m doing a vlog or something like that, I have music in the background, and you really can’t hear it that much.

I believe is its versatility; it’s extremely sharp, from 16 all the way to 35 millimeters.

So I can be vlogging at 16 millimeters, and if I need to take some more portrait photography or any kind of photography, really, I can bring it to 35 millimeters.

It’s extremely sharp. It’s a constant aperture all the way through, which means that it does not get any darker as you zoom in.

This lens at 35 millimeters, with the full-frame Canon EOSR, provides stunning results with beautiful bokeh in the background.

It’s a great full-frame lens, and the prices are going down as the RF lineup comes out, but it’s still extremely sharp, and you will not be disappointed with this lens.

The Canon 16 to 35 F 2.8, we end up using these lenses for most of our wedding day shoots, especially when we’re using a stabilizer; we have both versions two and version three, both are great.

We love this lens because they zoom internally, and I know it’s only 16 to 35, and you’re like, that’s not very much zoom, but it makes a big difference.

It was totally a game-changer for us; you’re always working around photographers or other people or second shooters on wedding days.

So, to have some flexibility whenever you want to shoot wide or zoom in a little bit tighter, It’s just a lifesaver.

The third reason we love using this lens is that it actually has pretty close focusing capabilities.

So, we can actually use this almost as a macro in many instances; we’ve done tons of weddings where I didn’t even use a macro for a ring shot; I just use this.

Especially when I’m shooting in 4k, it has that trough factor that helps out a little bit, but even not shooting in 4k, you can get pretty close.

So it’s very flexible that we don’t have to change lenses if I’m using it as a stabilizer when I’m shooting details, and I just have this on there.

I can zoom in getting real close and still get a pretty tight ring shot or a detail shot on whatever I’m shooting without changing to a different lens.

The fourth reason is that it’s just sharp; we’ve had many wide lenses in the past that, especially when you’re shooting wider, never seem to be able to hit their focus points are always going to be a little soft.

But this thing never disappoints in the area of sharpness.

So there you have it, the 16 to 35, we love it to great land super flexible, we definitely recommend this to anyone.

Especially if you’re doing a lot of stabilizer-based shooting.

We definitely recommend this to check it out.

CANON 16-35 F2.8: (Best Wide angle lens for wedding photography Canon)

Pros
  • Quality glass.
  • The contrast and the colors are spectacular.
  • Best wide f/2.8 aperture.
  • Super sharp.
  • Excellent image quality.
Cons
  • Bit pricey.
  • Some distortion and vignetting.

Canon 28mm F1.8: (Best cheap lens for wedding photography canon)

I am really excited to talk about the Canon 28 millimeter 1.8 lenses.

I didn’t know that this thing existed, and I wish that I had before.

I’m going to say if you are just starting in your business, you want a wider lens specifically for weddings, travel, group shots, you want a prime lens that is wide enough to capture the details and architecture when you’re traveling but also something that you could use in some portrait shots, I think, you must go for this.

This lens is $350. If you buy it now, you’re getting a great deal. You’re saving a significant amount of money.

The only major con that I would say about this lens is that it is slow to focus like I was getting frustrated when I was testing this lens out.

So, you can kind of get a better feel though it’s slow to focus.

It is still sharp.

Manual focus is great on this lens; the ring is pretty smooth; I could totally see this lens being used for videography.

I could see it being used for wedding photography like I said if you still want to be able to like to get the cute lunch, you want to do, like a photo of you in front of a monument something like that branding images portrait photography to some extent a little bit too wide for that.

This is a great option great price point; I wish I would have discovered it so much earlier.

CANON 28MM F1.8: (Best cheap lens for wedding photography canon)

Pros
  • Lighter & compact.
  • Excellent Fast aperture.
  • Less distortion.
  • Extremely sharp
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Slow to focus
  • No image stabilization.

Canon 135mm F2L: (Which Canon lens is best for portraits)

I will be talking about the Canon 135 F two L lens and why I think it’s the best portrait lens for under $1,000.

So there are many different reasons I really love this lens and recommend it to you.

And I’ve used it from portraits to weddings, events, commercial work, and even some video stuff.

I’ve had it for about four to five years and really don’t have many complaints at all with this lens.

It’s really a workhorse, and I’m really excited to dive into some specifics on why I think this is the best lens for portraits $1000.

The first point I want to make to you is that this is just an excellent focal 135 Looks so good for portraits for wedding events, as I mentioned before, and it’s a really unique look.

If you’re shooting wide open at f 2.8 f 4, your background blurs really nicely. You can get some really nice bokeh.

Another great thing is the distance you have from your subject. If you’re shooting 135, you’d have plenty of space in between yourself, and you’re able to give direction, and they’re usually are a little more relaxed with their portraits.

If you want to rock this guy during wedding ceremonies, you’ll be very impressed by the results, and again the distance you have is really nice because you can stand behind the crowd and everyone.

And still get really tight shots from the bride and groom. You can get good detail shots.

It’s one of my favorite lenses to use on weddings, especially once I get that individual worker shine with the bride and groom; it’s awesome.

The second point I want to make to you is that this lens is tack sharp, even shooting wide open at f 2.

And especially if you stop it down to 2.8 and f4, I mean, goodness is so sharp, even with older camera models with older autofocus systems.

This lens still nails focus pretty much every time unless you’re just wobbling your camera so much, and for a lens that’s eight years old, was maybe Tech’s really impressed.

The third point I want to make to you is that this thing is both delicious. I mean, the backgrounds, if you’re shooting wide open, they look amazing. I just love this lens.

My next point is that the colors that this lens produces are phenomenal; everything looks lifelike, like the real world, I mean.

I don’t know how to say the colors just pop; everything looks so good coming from this lens.

Especially if you shoot RAW and you don’t bring those images in and you start editing in Lightroom or Photoshop, everything just looks great coming out of this lens.

Another point is that you have a very close, minimum focus distance, which’s really important.

You can go down to what they say is point 9 meters. I just say a meter basically, so that’s around like, and this is really good when you’re shooting headshots.

Because you can get in tight, but not too tight again, you’re still maintaining a nice distance between yourself to the subject, and with it being so sharp in nail the eyes and your portrait.

And having that function, so you don’t understand even further back and crop in, or use the 70 the 200 and punch in, it’s beneficial, and I highly recommend switching to that mode if you’re doing headshots with this lens.

My next point is that this lens has really fast focus speed. You’ll be really impressed with how fast this lens focuses, even with older cameras, and for shooting on the 60 or a 5d mark ii maybe the mark iii.

You’ll be thoroughly impressed at how fast this lens responds to you have pressed that shutter.

It focuses so fast that it comes in handy a lot when you’re shooting weddings, events, live moments that you can’t really redo; having that to capture special moments is amazing.

Next up, I want to talk about the weight of this lens. Now, of course, this is an hourglass, so it’s got lots of glass in it, it’s got a little bit of weight to it, but it’s not a lot.

Now I don’t know the specific weight; I don’t want to get too technical; you’re not going to be thinking that this thing weighs however many grams in your bag when you’re out shooting portraits.

But compared to a 70 to 200, this thing is much lighter.

If I had to choose a lens for portraits, I obviously recommend this lens, but having a wider lens in your bag and on your camera for shooting a long duration of time really makes a difference.

So, it’s really nice to have a lightweight lens like this that still gives you amazing results.

Let’s talk about the age of this one’s a little bit. So as I said before, this lens came out in 2010 11, somewhere in there. So it’s getting old, but it’s hardly aging and what I mean by that is that it still gives you incredible results.

It’s got fast focus, great colors, and everything looks good coming out of this lens; and a good perk of it being old is that there are tons of used models out in the market.

For those looking to save and are on a budget but still want amazing quality, I really can’t recommend this one enough; if you have the money, you should definitely invest in this lens.

My next point is a pretty fun one, and that’s that this lens usually oppresses people in your clients, especially if you’ve got the hood on it.

It impresses people when you come out with your camera and a lens looking like this for the client that doesn’t know a ton about photography; you look professional.

You look like you have the right gear and hopefully know what you’re doing. That’s a tiny point, but I thought it’d be fun to throw it in there.

There’s no image stabilization in this lens, so you do have to compensate for that with the higher shutter speed.

I’d recommend at least going one to 50th of a second, preferably a little bit higher, to compensate for any shake that you would have.

Next, there’s no weather sealing on this lens. I pop the cap off; it’s just straight metal and the connection elements, so you don’t really want to take this guy out in the rain forest and be shooting the monkeys flying around the trees.

If I’m getting a little technical, there is some chromatic aberration in this lens and high contrast areas. I noticed that a lot.

I’m shooting backlit scenarios, and I have my subject that may be in the shade, and I have a really bright sun behind them; you will notice a little bit of that color fringing happening.

But honestly, truth be told, your client isn’t really going to notice that it’s very technical. You can fix some of that in Photoshop.

And for the price range of this lens, it’s not too much of a big deal to worry about.

It’s a focal length you think you would really enjoy for portraits and things like that; it is probably worth getting.

This is the 135mm f2 Prime from Canon; I absolutely love this lens for portraits; I think it’s a phenomenal deal coming in brand new at 1000, very reasonable for a lens of this quality.

It has amazing colors. It focuses fast, and it’s incredibly sharp, even shooting wide open. The bokeh is amazing.

There’s no image stabilization; there’s no weather sealing on this one.

Final thoughts, if you’re a portrait shooter and you’ve never shot 135, specifically this lens, you need to try it out. I almost guarantee you you’ll fall in love with this focal length.

You do need to take a step back if you’re shooting full-body portraits, but I don’t know; there’s just something about this lens that is amazing, and I love it.

I really hope you give it a try and take it out and create some amazing work because I know you can with this lens.

Canon 135mm F2L: (Which Canon lens is best for portraits)

Pros
  • Great colors & contrast.
  • Fast focus speed.
  • Pleasing bokeh.
  • Best for portraits.
  • Extremely sharp.
  • Less distortion.
  • Excellent wide aperture.
  • Good value for money.
Cons
  • No image stabilization.
  • Some chromatic aberrations.

Related posts:

4 Best Prime Lenses for Wedding Photography:

4 Best Sony Lens for Wedding Videography:

5 Best Sony Lens for Wedding Photography:

6 Best Nikon lens for portraits and wedding photography:

5 Best Lens for Wedding Videography:

 

 

Leave a Comment