Which is the best lens for landscape photography, Canon?
Here are my recommended top 4 best lens for landscape photography Canon:-
This is a classic and generally well-respected ultra-wide-angle lens for APSC digital cameras.
It’s a camera lens with a special place in my heart.
It’s the first ultra-wide-angle lens I ever bought back when I was living in South Korea, and I was learning about photography, which was a fascinating part of my life.
The lens goes as wide as 10 millimeters; that’s a far wider angle. This is helpful for landscape photography, indoors, or in tight spaces.
It’s also useful for pitching back your subject and giving you an extensive background.
Even if you’re shooting quite close up, the corners of your images will look dramatically stretched. Landing a new perspective to otherwise unexciting scenes and video footage at 10 millimeters looks especially cool.
It’s the equivalent of 16 millimeters on a full-frame camera.
I love that focal length; while the zoom range starts at 10 millimeters, as can zoom in to 22 millimeters, that’s actually a good zoom range for APSC ultra-wide-angle lens.
It has a maximum aperture of F 3.5 to 4.5, so it does darken a little as you zoom in. But still, that’s about average for this kind of lens.
It’s possible to get some out of the figure’s backgrounds, too, if you get real close.
However, bear in mind that the lens does not have image stabilization.
The build quality, the lens is based around a metal mount, which is nice and solid but not weather sealed.
The rest is made of good quality plastics, making it feel solid enough but not too big or heavy.
It’s all balanced well on pretty much any camera.
The lens zooming is not stamped, but it is very smooth to turn indeed and quite nice and precise.
It’s effortless to use during video work as it’s quite light to turn the front of the lens doesn’t extend.
The lens focuses fingers very smoothly and precisely, and you can turn it at any time, whether this lens is in manual focus or not.
The lens uses canons USM autofocus motor, which is lightning fast, silent, and accurate.
The whole lens has a substantial and well-made piece of kit without being too big or heavy.
For the lens’s image quality, I tested it on a 20 megapixel Canon 70D with peripheral illumination and chromatic aberration correction turned on.
At 10 millimeters and F 3.5, the lens is quite sharp in the middle of its images, although not quite perfect colors are neutral contrast is a bit so.
Even with chromatic aberration correction turned on, we see a little purple color fringing.
The lens is still reasonably sharp, and we do get decent enough sharpness in those corners.
22 is still very capable of getting very sharp pictures indeed.
When stopped down, even on a 20-megapixel camera, it’s just about sharp enough.
It’s a good performance for distortion and average for vignetting.
This Canon lens can focus as closely as 24 centimeters, which is reasonably close for creative Photography.
Finally, bokeh, this lens is capable of getting somewhat out-of-focus backgrounds if your subject is close enough.
The Canon lens does quite a good job out of figures backgrounds are generally fairly smooth.
You never get any major distractions.
It’s still quite a capable instrument.
It’s well built, and its optics is still just about sharp enough; it shows little distortion vignetting and flaring on average, and it has good quality bokeh; it’s just a nice all-rounder.
I’m super excited to talk to you about Canon 16 to 35 f4 lenses with image stabilization.
So this is a big deal for me because even though I use a lot of really nice camera equipment and lenses through my job as a landscape photographer.
The last 8 months that I’ve been working on creating a YouTube channel for landscape vlogging, I’ve had to be in front of the camera a lot more.
I found myself very quickly after, with a whole collection of kinds of cheap lenses, I was constantly bringing them and changing them.
Then finally, I said to myself, if I’m going to buy any new lenses, they would need to serve a real purpose that will enhance the quality of my photos and videos.
They needed to be of high quality, no more cheap discount lenses.
So, I looked at many lenses from Canon lenses because canon is about the only manufacturer that I really trust.
I didn’t really think any options were exactly what I needed, so I landed on Canon 16 to 35.
The F4 lens costs about $1,000 and gets excellent ratings and reviews. The F4 is the only lens that has image stabilization.
When you’re dealing with an ultra-wide lens, especially in a full-frame camera, image stabilization might not be super necessary.
Because the camera shake just isn’t going to be as obvious since that image is so wide.
But since I do a lot of videos, I wanted to make sure that I had image stabilization, improving the overall quality of my videos.
I also wanted to get into landscape photography which requires longer shutter speeds a lot of the time, and image stabilization could be something that can help with that.
Especially if I don’t have a full-on tripod set up, I’m just using a monopod or even handheld, so I landed on the F4 with image stabilization.
This lens really does seem fantastic the build quality is excellent.
The rings, the zoom ring, and the focus ring are huge, really grippy, really smooth, and it’s straightforward to use for the video.
I’ve been very shocked at how fast the autofocus is and how quiet the autofocus is on this lens.
And, of course, the image stabilizer really does help keep everything nice and smooth.
16 millimeters is significantly wider so that you can see a lot of the room around me than normally in my regular shot.
The 16 to 35 is an excellent budget lens for landscapes; the ability to go wide looks awesome, especially on a full-frame camera like the 60 marks 2.
The Canon 18 to 135 millimeter STM lens has an impressive zoom range.
I recently visited the Lake District to test this lens and use the full scope of that zoom range with landscape-type shots of 18 millimeters and more detailed zoomed-in shots about 135 millimeters.
The Canon 18 to 135 millimeter STM lens is an EFs lens which means it will only work with canons APS-C sensor cameras like Canon 80D.
That’s a handy range of focal length.
It’s suitable for so many different types of photography, and when you’re just starting, this versatility is handy.
Because you can experiment, you can try out different areas of photography, and this lens will allow you to do without having to switch lenses or purchase more.
That saves us time and the investment of even more money.
The lens has a maximum aperture of F 3.5 to F 5.6, depending on what parts of the zoom range you’re at.
This is very similar to the 18 to 55-millimeter kit lens.
However, thanks to that extra focal length, it really gives you an extra ability to blur out the background and get some nice bokeh in your shots with just 7 aperture blades.
The bokeh is not as creamy and delicious as it might be on more expensive lenses.
At 135 millimeters, where you really get the maximum effect of some half-decent background blur.
This is particularly useful when you’re shooting portraits, and you really want to isolate your subject from the background and really give it that professional style.
It weighs in at 480 grams, which means added to your camera isn’t going to pull your arm off if you’re carrying us around all day long.
It has a 67-millimeter filter thread for all the filters you might want to attach to your camera, and it comes with 16 elements in 12 groups for the glass inside the lens.
The Canon 18 to 135 millimeter STM lens comes with four-stop image stabilization, and I actually found that the image stabilization to be particularly impressive.
At that same range at the longer end of the focal length, the stabilization is capable of smoothing out some pretty severe bumps and movements in your lens.
This is particularly useful when you’re shooting landscape video with this lens, and it lets you achieve some super smooth shots.
Even when you’re hand-holding, the stabilization also improves the low light capability, and it lets you use a shutter speed four stops slower than you would normally.
The Canon 18 to 135 also has the STM focus motor, which is really quiet, really smooth, especially when you’re shooting videos.
So if we take a quick look around the lens, the first thing that strikes you is that it’s a much-improved quality over the standard 18 to 55-millimeter kit lens; it feels solid.
The lens is not weather-sealed, so you need to be careful when using it in bad weather.
The zoom ring is nice and smooth, and it also has a little lock switch on the front, which will lock it into 18 millimeters.
In the end image quality of the Canon 18 to 135 millimeter STM lens is about what you would expect for a lens in this price range.
It’s not the sharpest tool in the box, but it’s still pretty decent, especially considering the huge focal range at the wide end; this is a competent landscape lens.
But because you’ve got the extra zoom range, it opens up some opportunities that you may not always have.
That’s pretty good value for money.
Overall, I really liked using the Canon 18 to 135 millimeter STM lens.
The versatility it provides with decent quality is outstanding, and you can use it in so many different situations and capture good shots without changing your lenses.
It’s a joy to use for both video and stills, and it may be the only lens that some casual shooters will ever need.
If you’re looking to buy a good quality family camera system with the versatility to do landscape photography and few other things, this may be the lens for you if you’re buying your first SLR camera.
I can highly recommend getting this lens.
If you’re into landscape photography at all, you might think which lens is better for landscape photography?
A 70 to 200 F4 is a stellar lens and overall better for landscape photography.
Normally it’s the cheaper lens. It’s usually cheaper for 2 reasons.
It’s lighter because it doesn’t take as much to make this lens, it doesn’t take as much glass to make this lens, and it’s also not as wide or not as fast as the F2.8.
Now, that’s really not a big deal to me, but those are just the reasons that it’s cheaper for you.
I love the F4 because when I’m going out and shooting, I don’t like to have a ton of weight in my bag.
The F4, as I said, is cheaper than the F2.8, and it still does an outstanding job at shooting landscapes.
I think you really need to decide your own photography and think about what you’re actually shooting and what you’re shooting most.
If you’re shooting primarily landscapes, I honestly don’t see the reasoning for getting the F2.8.
70 to 200 f4 is primarily best for landscape photography.
It’s lighter, and it’s cheaper; you’re going to be putting more cash in your pocket to invest in your photography.
Maybe more gear, maybe more filters, or attachments that you can put on your camera.
This will allow you to get more of the necessary gear that you might want or invest back in your photography business.
The F4 will give you the option to do that; also, it’s lighter; you’re not lugging gear; you can log in longer miles with better hikes.
Overall, have a better experience using this lens; that’s the 70 to 200 f4. The 70 to 200 f4, I think it’s better for landscape photography.
Ask yourself, what am I primarily shooting, and then decide which lens you need to get.
I think a lot of times, landscape photographers look at prices and decide. Which is more expensive? It must be a better lens right, well, not all the time.
Decide for your own photography, and you’re not just buying a more expensive lens to impress other people.
You might see in the field you’re buying a lens so that it can complement.
What you’re actually trying to shoot in the field so that you can go out and create better photographs for your own enjoyment and your own photography style.