10 Best Sony Lens for Night Photography: (2021 Guide & Reviews)

Hey, what’s up guys, and in this Guide, I’m gonna be telling you about the best Sony lens for night photography.

That you can use for night photography to get those epic night shots.

And also some of the problems with it what you need to know before you buy it.

Let’s drive-in:

Which is the best Sony lens for Night photography?

Here are my recommended top 10 best Sony lens for Night photography:-

Sigma 16mm 1.4: (Best lens for Astrophotography Sony A6300, A6400, A6000, A6500)

Today we’ll be talking about the sigma 16-millimeter f. 1.4 lens, specifically for Sony E mount cameras like the A6300, A6400 A6500.

So I bought this lens for about a year now. I purchased it around the same time that I purchased the Sony a 6500.

My reasons for purchasing it were primarily for vlogging before I purchased it.

I was doing a lot of landscape photography, cityscape photography on location. It was tough for me to film what I was doing with a single camera in a single life, take photos, and film the whole thing.

I also plan on using the lens a little bit for Astrophotography.

And I ended up using it a lot more than I originally anticipated for Astrophotography just because the wide aperture of the lens is so conducive for that type of thing.

I haven’t really gotten into the more professional cinematography aspects of the Sony A6500. Yet, I plan to get into that, but the sigma 16 mil of 1.4 does an incredible job for video.

We’ll talk about Astrophotography, and we’ll talk about sharpness other things like that.

So in terms of just general information, yes, this lens is a prime lens.

It’s 16 millimeters with a very wide aperture of 1.4, which makes it very good for Astrophotography or portraits, and things like that.

Or just in shots where you want to separate whatever subject you’re looking at from the rest of the field of view.

Let’s go over some things I absolutely loved about the sigma 16-millimeter f 1.4 after a year’s worth of use.

The first thing, and this should come as no surprise, is the aperture, an aperture of 1.4, is just incredible for so many things, and as I said before.

I’ve been able to get amazing shots of the night sky.

I don’t really do many portraits, but I have done some creative portraits of my wife.

So what I’ve learned, what I feel like I’ve gotten very good at doing in terms of Astrophotography with this lens, is taking you to know taking a few shots back to back to back, maybe five or six and a period of 30 seconds or so.

And then blending all those in Photoshop to get a very detailed, almost noise-free image of the Milky Way in the night sky.

I’ve been able to take some images of the Milky Way that I’ve never dreamed ideal to take before purchasing this lens, and aboard for Astrophotography, this lens is insane.

Other than that, the build quality is excellent, the lens itself feels mostly metal, and the focus ring feels a little rubber-like, maybe soft plastic, but it’s very well built.

The next thing I absolutely love about the lens is its autofocusing capability with the Sony system.

So this lens is obviously not a Sony lens; the Sigma lens it’s built for the Sony email.

But in terms of autofocusing, I’ve seen a zero difference between the speed and the reliability between this lens and other Sony lenses that I use.

They seem to focus just as quickly; continuous autofocus in video mode is fine.

I actually don’t do hardly any portrait photography; I’m mostly just a cityscape, landscape, interior design photographer with some automotive stuff on the side.

So autofocus isn’t that big of a deal to me because I can just manually focus.

The only other thing that I can think about that is a downside to this lens is the weight.

Now, this lens weighs 405 grams. That doesn’t sound all that heavy at first, but if you’re vlogging with it like I do a lot.

It does get kind of heavy in hand and makes your shoulder tired.

But in terms of Vlogging, the 16-millimeter focal length is pretty good. It’s very wide. It’s wide enough for vlogging.

That’s really about the things that I disliked. There not many things to dislike; this lens is awesome, so awesome.

In fact, the negatives are barely like a blip on the radar compared to all the positives that you get with this lens.

Sigma 16mm 1.4: (Best lens for Astrophotography Sony A6300, A6400, A6000, A6500)

Pros
  • Quick Focus.
  • Excellent build quality.
  • Incredible job for video.
  • Best for Astrophotography.
Cons
  • Heavy.

Sigma 14mm 1.8: (The best lens for Night photography Sony A7iii)

I just want to talk about why I bought it, what I liked and what I dislike.

So, we’re going to get started with why I bought this lens.

I bought this lens. I’ve been waiting to find this lens because I love shooting photos, if you guys know me. I love shooting videos.

I love getting wide-angle shots because, to me, they’re so crucial.

It’s so important, and it just tells a lot within a video. The other reason why I bought this lens is how sharp it delivers.

This was 1.8, so better bokeh, better in low light, and sharp wide.

So I was finally happy that I bought this lens.

I shoot many videos in the studio, so you will control lighting and adjust and whatnot when it comes to a studio.

So I bought this lens because the style in the image that it provides, it’s different.

I actually shot a music video at night, and this lens just delivers, it just gives you something different, and I needed something different.

I wanted to get creative and try something different, and this is a super crazy waiting list going to give me that type of image.

So there are many ways to implement this lens.

It’s not just for Astrophotography which is what this lens is known for.

So that is the reason why I’ve purchased this lens also in case I shoot the real estate paid work for clients and wedding photography.

Overall the positives to this lens, what I love is the sharpness; I think this lens is really sharp for photos and videos.

It’s built well, and it’s weather-sealed.

It’s definitely the lens that I recommend to you guys.

Now the one downfall to this lens is you can’t shoot photos vertical; everything looks distorted and sloppy.

Another downfall to this lens is the distortion; you got to be extra careful.

I did my study before I bought this lens. It’s just something I’ve always wanted.

I wanted a sharp whitening lens that’s really fast, in case I need extra bokeh extra stuff are low like this was the lens.

I knew it’s just, it was expensive, and I finally came across it, and I’m excited that I bought the lens.

So this lens just plays a role for me in different types of areas; it’s just more.

Now, if you’re just trying to get this lens for photos, you can shoot wherever you want, you can boost the aperture you can.

I will definitely be using it a lot on my music videos and at weddings for ceremonies.

You can use this on so many different types of shoots, so definitely look into this lens.

It’s expensive, but for a reason, so hopefully, you guys like this.

Maybe this lens does make sense for you guys; it just all depends on what we’re all shooting, so definitely a great lens.

Built quality is outstanding, sharpness the image you get out of it, it’s worth the price, to be honest.

Sigma 14mm 1.8: (Best lens for Night photography Sony A7iii)

Pros
  • Better in low light.
  • Sharp wide.
  • Good for both photo & video.
  • Excellent build quality.
  • Worth the price.
Cons
  • Bit expensive.
  • Some distortion.

Rokinon 24mm 1.4: (Best Sony lens for Astrophotography)

The reason it’s better is that it doesn’t have any of those weird distortions. Really, it’s a fairly sharp lens.

This is a full-frame manual lens available for almost every camera mount, including Sony, Canon, Nikon, Fuji, and Micro Four Thirds.

It’s a manual focus lens, meaning that you don’t have autofocus. It’s not going to be good for moving subjects or anything.

It lets in just as much light; it doesn’t have those weird distortions. It’s a manual focus, and it’s also a manual aperture lens.

It is a sharp, fast lens with a minimum focus distance of just about 10 inches.

While you wouldn’t use this lens for portraits, many other photo subjects will be great choices for this type of lens.

It’s ideal for landscapes and street photography, still life interiors, low light photography, and perhaps most of all, Astrophotography.

It’s got quite a bit of vignetting, but you know, any lens wide open is going to have some.

For the price, this lens is really awesome.

It’s my new favorite lens for my night sky shots, and you just can’t beat it.

When I want to zoom in on the best part of the Milky Way, I jump to the 24 millimeters.

Amazingly this lens remains sharp even wide open at F 1.4 If you’re after an extremely narrow depth of field.

Having an aperture of f 1.4 means that you’ll also have plenty of light without having to resort to high ISO.

So that’s one of the nice things about having a lens with such a wide aperture.

If you like the look of a narrow depth of field for a street product and still life photography or if you really into Astrophotography, this is a lens you need to take a look at your offer’s great performance at a reasonable price.

And I think that once you experience a manual focus lens, you might find yourself liking it much more for these types of photography.

It’s awesome for video. I don’t know if any of you guys are video shooters, but it’s really cool to have that wide-angle yet a really shallow depth of field.

The only downside to this lens is that it’s the manual focus. And also, the focus ring is really kind of loose, like it doesn’t take hardly anything to bump it out of focus.

Other than that, you can’t beat the price; you can’t beat the performance.

This really is the best lens for Astrophotography.

I know I’ve said that before, but it really is to get to try it out.

It’s worth checking out, and it’s definitely worth the purchase.

Rokinon 24mm 1.4: (Best Sony lens for Astrophotography)

Pros
  • Fairly sharp lens.
  • Doesn’t have wired distortion.
  • Good value for money.
  • Wide aperture.
  • Awesome for the video.
Cons
  • Manual focus.
  • Bit of vignetting.

Sony 16-35mm f2.8: (Best Sony Alpha lens for Night photography)

This is by far my most used lens for all sorts of landscape and travel and even Astrophotography.

Let’s go through the pros and cons of why I use it the most of any lens in my bag and why you need to have it in yours as well.

So there’s this assumption in photography that prime lenses are the only way to go. It’s a little bit of a myth.

Prime lenses are fantastic, but I don’t believe they’re the only good lens.

When I was first starting in photography, of course, my budget was minimal.

So, I only invested in the Sony 28 millimeter F2 once I figured out that I had a little more budget to play with.

I knew it wasn’t just like a two-month-long fascination, I invested in the Sony 55 F 1.8, and those are my only 2 lenses for a year and a half, and while this did push me to get more creative and explore outside the box.

It also was a little bit limiting for me.

It forced me to explore new compositions because I didn’t have the zoom capability of an interesting zoom lens.

There are times when you can’t just zoom with your feet, you end up going downhill, and then you’re too low for the shot; that’s a whole different issue.

Sometimes you move left to the right because you want to change your composition, but something gets in your way, and zooming in just a tiny bit wouldn’t solve this problem for you.

So, over time I started to realize that while the image quality on prime lenses is incredible.

There’s a lot to be said for the functionality of zoom lenses for a hobbyist, I found those to be perfect, but once I started booking paid gigs, I found out that there’s actually a huge draw to shooting.

I worked for a travel guide for a while, and we would feature everything in a city that we could find.

So, good restaurants, famous people, music venues, outdoor hiking, opportunities, etc.

And that is such a broad diversity of subjects; there’s no possible way to choose one-two or even three primes that really gets the job done in every scenario.

Stopping to change lenses meant that I just didn’t get the shot; that’s why I invested in a zoom lens, and this 16 to 35 to me is indispensable for that.

Well, I don’t find myself shooting a whole lot of interior stuff nowadays, like restaurants and music venues.

I do still find myself doing a lot of running gun photography and videography in the outdoors, and this is still by far my go-to lens when you’re on a hike.

The 16 to 35 is a fantastic focal length, the 16 super-wide for great landscape shots.

35 zoomed-in enough; you can put a person in the shot and get a nice environmental portrait.

F 2.8, for me, is plenty of apertures to get great bokeh and drop off if you want to isolate them against the background, and more so if you’re shooting with something like a seminar.

For where you have 42 or more megapixels to play with, that 35 millimeters on the top and actually can be cropped into a close to 60 or 70 millimeters, and you’ll still have enough resolution leftover for a magazine placement, especially on the internet.

Now for running gun video projects, this lens also has a lot more flexibility than you think.

You can film it at full frame, and you’ll get a 16-millimeter field of view which is super wide but very functional for fast running style shots where you want some landscape in it.

But with Sony cameras, you have the option to crop into a super 35 field of view, which turns 35 millimeters at the zooming extent of this lens into just about 50 millimeters.

You can actually turn this 16 to 35 lens and get almost 100 millimeters of zoom capability out of it for 1920 by 1080 final project.

The one downside of it is that this lens is heavy, especially compared to many prime lenses.

And I found that it does tend to sort of overload gimbals and steady cams and overloads my shoulders after a long day of shooting.

But for the convenience offered by a lens like this and the functionality of having that plied zoom range.

I’m willing to take the hit on the shoulders and just be a little sore the next day.

So there you have it; those are why I am just absolutely obsessed with this lens; it’s my favorite.

I have attached one of my cameras at all times on every single shoot that I do nowadays.

And I take it out for everything from landscapes to product shots to Astrophotography.

If you don’t have one of these yet, I highly suggest picking one up.

Nothing else. Read one for a weekend, take it out, give it a shot, shoot some demo shots, and I think you’ll like it.

Sony 16-35 f2.8: (Best Sony Alpha lens for Night photography)

Pros
  • Fantastic focal length.
  • Super wide.
  • Great bokeh.
  • Awesome for the video.
Cons
  • Bit pricey.

Rokinon 12mm f2: (Best Sony lens for Night Sky photography)

This is the best budget wide-angle lens that you can use to get some epic shots for night photography.

We’re talking about the best whitening lens that you can buy on a budget for your night photography; now, what lens is that is the Rokinon 12 millimeter F2 lens.

This lens is pretty cheap, coming in the right at around $300.

So, this is a pretty cheap lens, but you will get pretty Fantastic professional results.

So, I photographed with this lens for about 5 years and got many good results.

Now, if you’ll notice, the F stop on these lenses is pretty small.

In numerical value, and that’s because a smaller number of F stop will mean a wider range of aperture that you get a wide aperture ring.

That’s going to let in a lot of light and collect the light of the Milky Way that shining something settings like F2 ISO, 800, and a 22nd shutter speed is going to be perfect for any night photography and Milky Way photography.

Because it’s really going to let in a lot of light and focus on the Milky Way, a galactic core that you see so often in the Milky Way shots.

Not only that, but night photography can be stuff like star trails, too.

So if you’re photographing star trails, something like the same F2 ISO 100 of 32nd exposure and set your camera to continuous shooting and using a cable release will allow you to take photos constantly.

Those are some of the benefits of lenses like these from Rokinon that are really going to come in at a cheaper price point.

That is going to help you save cash and get out into these locations and shoot these images.

I use this for several years when I was starting in landscape photography and got some pretty cool shots of the landscape scene.

And then would use the same setup to go out that night and photograph night sky photography.

So this lens is really helpful, but there are also some drawbacks to this lens that you need to be aware of before buying it.

These lenses are only manual focus and manual aperture adjustment.

There’s no autofocus feature to this lens; It’s only manual focus, so your subject would move around within the scene.

It would be tough to constantly adjust the manual focus on this and adapt to what was going on with your subject.

As your subjects aren’t moving around for landscapes, you can spend a lot of time waiting in the right conditions.

Getting your focus exactly attack sharp, and then photographing same goes for night sky photography as well.

Again, if you’re only shooting landscapes or night sky photography, again, a winner for you in that scenario.

Now let’s talk about the manual aperture ring that comes on this lens.

It’s a really cool feature, and I like using it a lot because you can easily just switch around and this lens and get the right aperture that you want for it.

With this lens, I have noticed that you have to focus on the night sky because you have to set this when you are focusing on something like the focus to infinity.

Overall, considering all things for the landscape and night sky photography, this is a phenomenal lens.

Pros
  • Budget wide-angle lens.
  • A wider range of aperture.
  • Wide aperture ring.
  • Better in low light.
Cons
  • Manual focus.

Samyang 12mm f2: (The best lens for Night photography Sony A6000)

So, we’re going to talk about what is my favorite lens on the A 6000? And that is the Samyang 12mm f2.

It is a nice lens. It is mostly plastic with some metal construction, but it’s mostly plastic.

It’s that very high-quality plastic, so you don’t have to worry about it falling apart whenever you’re focusing.

It is a manual-only focus lens, which for a lot of people I know, they’d say no, I need out of focus, man. But don’t worry because it’s fantastic.

What if you have an A6000 or an A6300 or a Sony camera with an APSC sensor or full-frame interchangeable lens.

Then you can easily access the focus magnifying, which means that if you have a manual focus lens, you will get that focus spot on every time without hesitation.

And there you go, it is not a deal-breaker anymore, the quality, what can I say about the quality.

The quality to the stands for bringing 12-millimeter lenses fantastic.

This lens has a lot of things that beat the Sony lens. First of all, it is slightly smaller, it is slightly lighter, which is fantastic.

You want a small light lens to bring around your camera; it produces better color, it produces much better contrast because it’s a prime lens.

The Samyang is a prime lens, so it’s a fixed focal length, so there is no moving glass inside, except for focusing.

There’s no zooming in and out.

So, it was made and optimized for that focal length, and you get amazing quality sharpness, all the way across just slight distortion.

It’s a wide-angle lens. In the end, it is not a fisheye lens. It is optimized for an APSC sensor, so that is also fantastic.

It works great if you want to take Astrophotography.

That’s great for Astrophotography because F2 is a nice F stop to take Astrophotography.

So for all you Astrophotographers out there that want to take pictures, this lens is perfectly ideal for you.

Another thing to consider why this lens is better is simply the fact of the price.

You can find the Samyang 12 millimeter F2 anywhere from $250 to $320.

This lens is sharp enough that you can easily crop it in slightly, and it’ll look great.

You can crop it into 18 millimeters. You can even go as far as maybe 22 millimeters.

Now, what about bokeh? Well, at 12 millimeters F2, you’re really not going to get that much bokeh, and there are some out-of-focus areas.

What about the colors? Well, I don’t know how to explain this to you, but in short, the colors on this lens are amazing.

The color reproduction is amazing; I am convinced it has something to do with the optics on the inside. One must have some magical coatings because this lens can really produce some punchy, vibrant colors concerning its competitors.

You will clearly see that the colors are amazing; you can achieve some really contrast in colors.

And really, you don’t have to be afraid to move that slider up to really get nice rich saturated colors.

Let me tell you something; this lens is so great. I have it on my camera 95% of the day.

What about the video quality? Can I use this lens to make great videos? Yes, you can, because it has fantastic color reproduction.

Overall, you will not find a prime lens 12 millimeter F2 at such a low price, and Samyang makes fantastic lenses.

Samyang 12mm f2: (Best lens for Night photography Sony A6000)

Pros
  • Smaller & lighter.
  • Produce better color.
  • Better contrast.
  • Wide-angle lens.
  • Cheap in price.
  • Good for video.
Cons
  • Manual focus.
  • Fixed focal length.

Sony 16-35mm F4: (Best Budget Sony lens for Night photography)

The 16 to 35 F4 for Sony full-frame lens. I’m going to tell you what I like and what I don’t about it.

As far as build quality is concerned, it’s what you’d expect of a Sony lens.

It’s awesomely small coming in at only 3.88 inches long and just over three inches wide.

It’s solid metal construction, and it weighs just over a pound.

You’ll find a large grippy zoom ring in the middle, with a smaller focus ring in the front, which is also metal and, like all the Sony lenses, tend to collect dirt and dust pretty easily.

It does come with a lens hood, as well as a little bag to protect your lens.

You will notice the absence of any buttons, including a manual focus button or even a focus hold button, and that a bit disappointing.

The lens does extend as you zoom in as well; although it does have a nice sturdy metal mount, it does lack proper weather sealing.

So talk about what everybody wants to know, the performance, of course, does it justify the big price tag, and let’s talk about the autofocus system.

Right off the bat, it’s snappy, it’s fast, it’s silent, and like a lot of Sony lenses, it does the job. It works great.

Now, who’s this lens for? Is it a portrait lens? Sure.

35 millimeter makes an interesting portrait lens, it’s great for real estate, and in just about every situation you throw at it, I mean an f4.

Its bokeh is average, but the autofocus works great, even in low light.

Personally, I love this lens for journalistic-type photography and, of course, for landscapes.

Keep in mind one feature you are paying for in this lens is image stabilization, which goes great with Sony’s Ibis systems in their newer cameras.

With the sharpness and the performance of this lens, you’re going to notice a little bit of vignetting and a tiny bit of distortion.

And of course, I’m not too worried about those things in any lens because I come over here and just click on profile correction; right off the bat will fix those things for me, so I don’t worry about that.

16 millimeters; however, you’re really going to notice the vignetting and the distortion, and of course, being an ultra-wide lens, this is quite common.

And again, it’s not a big deal to me because I can go ahead and click that, and it’s pretty much gone. It straightens everything out, and I lose that vignetting.

It’s quite sharp, and it’s very nice, but as far as wide-angle lenses go, pretty good performance, I’d say, I’ve never had a problem with it.

I’ve always taken nice pictures, and I’ve been happy with the results, and you expect absolutely no less for the price.

So as far as performance goes, packing, image stabilization, incredible sharpness, and a great focal range are very nice performer lenses.

This is a great versatile lens; I like many great things about it, and a few that I don’t, and with not a lot of competition. It is a great contender.

It’s ripped between considered and definitely buy if you’re looking for a great ultra-wide lens.

This might be the one for you if the budget is an issue.

SONY 16-35MM F4: (Best Budget Sony lens for Night photography)

Pros
  • Excellent build quality.
  • It’s fast; it’s silent.
  • Autofocus works great.
  • Ultra wide-angle lens.
  • Quite sharp.
  • Great focal length.
  • Versatile lens.
  • Great for the price.
Cons
  • Absence of buttons.
  • Bit vignetting.
  • Bit distortion.

Sony 24mm F1.4 Low Light Beast: (Best Sony Lens for Night Street Photography)

I believe it’s been over a year that I’ve had the 24-millimeter f 1.4.

What do I think about it? Do I still recommend that 24 millimeters 1.4 yes or no, or are it better to get a zoom lens, maybe a little wider? Let’s answer that question together.

It has been one of my favorite lenses over the past year, and I want to tell you if it’s worth it or not.

What I love about my 24 millimeters 1.4. First of all, and that’s something I think we can all agree on, it is tiny.

It is 200 grams lighter than any other 24 millimeters.

It’s a great lens also to scare people off that 24 millimeter 1.4 is small tiny convex fits in your hand, fits in your pocket, and most importantly is not going to scare off anyone actually.

You’re just going to look like a normal tourist, and if you were trying to approach people, they’re going to be most likely okay with you taking photos of that.

So, on top of being discreet approachable, and very lightweight.

You also get an amazing bokeh and crazy good low-light performance.

I was able to get shots I would have never gotten with another lens because the F 1.4 really allows you to shoot in low light with a faster shutter speed than the lower ISOs and still capture that.

Actually, that is a big advantage if you are trying to shoot at night a lot.

You will love that lens as much as I do, and last but not least, the great thing about that lens is that it’s really designed for us through photography.

And if you want to capture the stars and have them like tack sharp, that will work Marvels.

Now the last thing I love is that it has slowly become my favorite lens to go out.

What do I mean by that is that when I go out with friends or with family or with my wife and I want to capture a little bit of what’s happening, keep some souvenirs for myself, this is the lens.

I will always pack and take it with me because it’s enough to capture the whole group.

It’s also good enough in low light if I’m in a restaurant or a dark bar, and it’s just so small and discreet.

I never had to think about it. Just pop it in my bag, and that’s it.

So, overall, I gotta say, I’ve been impressed by the versatility of that lens.

Although it’s a prime lens, and that is something I’ve come to really, really appreciate and love over the past year.

Now, what is not so good about that lens? Well, first of all, let’s just put it out there, the price.

I mean, if you’re earning your money, just like everyone else, that’s a lot of hours of work, if you’re able to maybe work with your camera that is an investment that will pay off very quickly in my opinion.

If you’re looking for a lens, if you’re looking to progress and have something that will get you to think differently, and really I think, is fun.

I would recommend that.

This would get you to shoot absolutely everything from portraits, Streets to landscapes and Astrophotography.

So if you’re hesitating about that lens because it is a lot of money, or you’re not sure it’s going to be versatile enough.

Let me tell you; I think you’ll love it, at least if you have the same kind of shooting style as me.

SONY 24MM F1.4 Low Light Beast: (Best Sony Lens for Night Street Photography)

Pros
  • Low light beast.
  • Smaller & lighter.
  • Versatile lens.
Cons
  • Bit pricey.

Sony 24-70mm F2.8: (Best Sony Focal Length for Night Photography)

I use this lens for a while, and I will discuss this lens with my personal opinion.

I’m going to focus on three major points; first, of course, the look how it looks, how I feel about it.

The second is autofocus; I know you guys really want to know how fast this thing is.

The third is image quality.

So first thought, look, no need to say, this is just an amazing piece of metal.

When I touch this for the first time, that was like, Wow, buddy is excellent and metallic in really thick, and of course, it’s heavy.

The touching field is really amazing. It feels like a $2,000, you know it feels like a laboratory, it is very satisfying zooming is a little bit heavy but personally, I really love this.

And when it comes to focusing, Wow, I could do this full day and of course.

Those zoom rings, so very easy to use, nice to touch, an amazing piece of rubber, and he has a map control switch and focuses lock switch.

So yeah, a little bit heavy, but I love this heaviness again since this lens doesn’t have image stabilization.

So I can use this heaviness to take my footage stable, you know what? Besides, the weight doesn’t matter to me at all.

I tried to vlog with this, but this was killing my right arm. Obviously, this lens is not the vlogging lens.

So about the look, I cannot find any negative points about this if you care about this.

So next is the autofocus; what about this? I think this autofocus speed is just amazingly fast, and it’s very natural.

It chases moves stop; everything is very natural.

But there was one negative point in manual focus; it was difficult for us because the focus speed is really fast.

So it’s sometimes passed us by the object, which I wanted to focus on, maybe because of F 2.8.

So if you want to focus on everything on your face, I think you need to close the aperture a little bit.

But also, indeed, I am not good at manual focus, and I have to practice it, but this was really fun using manual focus for the first time.

This gave me a new experience, but autofocus is incredible.

So you have nothing to worry about this, even if you’re going to use manual focus for most of the time just in case you have strong backup autofocus.

This autofocus will make your work stable and secure.

It’ll give you a great working environment.

So the last one is image quality; I was surprised by this wide view.

Like when I Vlog, the balance between face and background is really great, and when I feel the landscape, it had a wide image and a wide dynamic range.

And even though the opposite is so far away, the image is still sharp about the sharpness and resolution of cinematography.

This lens is doing a prime lens, and you can also shoot with F 2.8 through all focal lengths.

So, when it’s dark, you still can get sure and a smooth and creamy and wide range of colors.

This can do a lot of things when it comes to photography.

The contrast is really high, the range of color is really wide, especially since this lens catches the light very well.

Sony officially says this lens is good at catching the light; I completely agree with this.

So the conclusion is just the lens keeps high resolution and sharpness through all focal lengths, and personally, this lens is good at photography, cinematography.

It has a wide range of colors and tight black in vivid color, and the light is really smooth and creamy, but also the image is sharp in crispy.

So, I know what you guys want to know the most is this worth buying? Well, if you have the budget, I think it is a good idea to purchase this.

SONY FE 24-70MM F2.8: (Best Sony Focal Length for Night Photography)

Pros
  • Amazing build quality.
  • Autofocus speed is just amazing.
  • Wide dynamic range.
  • Sharpness.
  • High contrast.
  • The colors are really wide.
  • Great focal length.
Cons
  • Bit heavy.
  • Manual focus.
  • Bit pricey.

Sony 50mm F1.8: (Best Sony E Mount lens for Night photography)

This little guy, we’re going to break down and see if it’s good and whether you should buy it.

It’s very compact just weighs in at only 196 grams.

To be honest, being one of the lightest and most inexpensive e mount lenses.

It doesn’t feel like the Sony lenses we’ve come to expect.

It is made from a plastic or composite material but definitely differs from saying the 85, which has almost the same design.

The focus ring turns smoothly and accurately, and it’s actually a plastic material as opposed to most of the ones that are metal on Sony, and in this case, I actually prefer it.

This lens has a 49-millimeter filter thread and a minimum focus distance of just under 1/5 feet.

Unfortunately, and all too common with Sony, this lens lacks a rubber gasket or seal, which means it’s not a proper weather shield.

You’ll notice a complete absence of any buttons on this lens, including the manual focus switch, and also note that this lens is not image stabilized.

As far as value is concerned, it is a good buy for the money at just 200 to $250.

Now there may be some third-party or adapted lenses that you can use in this price range.

But it’s always best to stick with native glass if you can get it to get all the functionality and performance that your camera can offer.

So let’s have a look at what matters most, and that’s performance.

First, let’s look at the autofocus system. This lens focus system is not internal, and as you heard, it’s quite loud.

Its overall focus speed is anything but impressive, and it does have quite a bit.

It can be quite jittery when trying to find focus, and if audio is important to you, the sound from the motors might be a bit of an issue.

At the end of the day, it is a lens designed for photography, and really, that’s where it shines.

The image quality is actually quite impressive, even wide open at 1.8.

The image is very sharp in the center and reasonably sharp in the corners.

The autofocuses work flawlessly, and for the price of the lens, the bokeh is phenomenal.

Some of the best I’ve seen on our 50 F1.8.

This lens does offer a lot, including some amazing sharpness and bokeh.

So wrapping up with a few final thoughts, I think this lens is perfect for people just starting and looking for that next step above the kit lens.

This is a versatile lens, offering a fast aperture with lots of value in a small package.

If you’re just getting started, Look for a great portrait lens or budget effector.

I put this one rate between considering and definitely buy.

SONY FE 50MM F1.8: (Best Sony E Mount lens for Night photography)

Pros
  • Compact & light.
  • Good value for money.
  • The focus ring turns smoothly and accurately.
  • Versatile lens.
  • Fast aperture.
  • Excellent image quality.
  • Sharpness.
  • Pleasing bokeh.
Cons
  • No weather shield.
  • Absence of buttons.
  • The Focus system is not internal and loud.

CONCLUSION:

Alright, guys, so that concludes all the lenses we’re going to talk about today in this article.

Do you guys have any experience with these lenses? What are your thoughts on them?

Which are your best Sony Lens for Night Photography?

Is there a lens that I didn’t mention in this article that you love to use for night photography?

Please leave your thoughts and comments below.

Related Posts:

12 Best Nikon Lenses for Night Photography:

Leave a Comment