4 Best Micro Four Third Lens For Real Estate Photography: (2021 Guide & Reviews)

So you already made a decision, or you’re deciding on starting a real estate photography videography business.

What is the reason and why we even need this Micro four third lens?

Which is the best micro four thirds lens for real estate photography?

If you guys are starting in the real estate photography business, you’re probably wondering which lenses you should use?

I ran into that problem the same when I first started.

So let me show you some best micro four thirds lenses for real estate photography.

Let’s drive-in:

Do professional photographers use micro four-thirds?

There is a bright camera for the right job, and sometimes it’s better to have a small form factor camera like Olympus, or sometimes it might be good to have a medium format camera; it depends on the job you do.

What best micro four thirds lens for real estate photography should I buy?

Here are my recommended top 4 best Micro Four Third Lens For Real Estate Photography:

Laowa 9mm f/2.8: (Best Ultra-Wide Micro Four Third Lens)

My favorite lens for the APSC system, whether you use Sony or micro 4/3 or even canon.

So this lens is super small; it stands for zero distortion, and yeah, this lens is absolutely incredibly sharp.

This lens has single-handedly been the biggest reason I have not jumped to a full-frame camera for real estate work; I just haven’t needed it.

Even it’s 4 millimeters on full-frame that’s almost too wide, and in most houses, there is such a thing as too wide, and it looks really distorted to the eye, and it doesn’t look really all that appealing.

But this lens looks great in houses, and it can open up small houses make them look much bigger.

Also, I love using this in bathrooms and tight spaces, laundry rooms.

Tight, narrow kitchens really do a great job of opening up the shot.

It works great for photos and videos.

However, taking photos with this is a manual lens, so you will need to make sure that you set your focus ring to infinity.

The same thing with video aperture goes from F 2.8 to F 22, so you get a wide array.

I have noticed a little bit of vignette at F 2.8, but it’s really not that hard for me to correct and post. Just by pulling it back and feathering it, I can clean that up pretty well.

I noticed really no vignettes and photos, which is important because that’s where most of your real estate photography will happen.

They do include a lens hood with this unit. However, I just found that the lens hood is sort of cheap. 

Overall the build quality is great; it’s all made of metal, and it doesn’t weigh a lot. It’s also a tiny lens, so it can just fit in almost any little pocket of your bag or kit.

And it’s really super easy to balance on a gimbal which I appreciate. The hardest problem I have is the fact that I don’t have a lens.

After using it for a year, really happy with its purchase.

I like shooting Sony specifically because the color science to me is okay; it’s great.

And the fact that it does so well in low light in a lot of these rooms.

I can really bump the ISO up really high to like 2000 sometimes and not get any noise, which to me is tremendous.

If you shoot on the micro four-thirds system, they have the 7.5 millimeters broken on F 2.

Actually, it’s an F 2.8, but that also offers zero distortion, but they do have the nine-millimeter available for Canon and Fuji, so no matter what you shoot on.

Laowa 9mm f/2.8: (Best Ultra-Wide Micro Four Third Lens)

Pros
  • Great build quality
  • Super small, Lighter & compact.
  • Incredibly sharp.
  • Smooth manual focus ring.
  • Less distortion
  • Best ultra-wide field of view.
Cons
  • A little bit of vignette in at F 2.8
  • Manual focus isn’t for everyone.

Olympus 7-14mm F2.8 Lens: (Best Olympus lens for real estate photography)

I’ve had this lens for quite a while now, just getting around to reviewing it now.

And the reason I originally bought this lens was to do some real estate videography and photography.

So this is good for landscapes but excellent for real estate photography and videography.

Olympus 7 to 14 millimeter, f 2.8 weighs around 534 grams, so it isn’t crazily heavy.

But it does have a very nice feel and build quality; this lens features a zoom range from 7 millimeters to 14 millimeters.

The Olympus 7-14 millimeter f 2.8 Pro takes image quality to another level, specifically in a couple of really key areas.

The thing is sharp from edge to edge.

It has far fewer chromatic aberrations and Olympus, though it isn’t perfect, and handles flare considerably better than the Panasonic.

So it is quite a wide-angle lens. It has a constant aperture of 2.8, which is really nice for those low-light situations.

So I went with this one at its widest angle of 7 millimeters.

It does have a bit of distortion but nothing too crazy that can be fixed in post.

I must admit, though, when using this lens, the majority of the time, I actually used it at around 8 or 9 millimeters, which is actually around 16 millimeters to 18 millimeters, full Frame equivalent.

I did this to avoid as much distortion as possible only if I absolutely had to. Did I shoot at its widest focal length?

I never really noticed any chromatic aberration or vignetting with this lens and found it very sharp, even though it’s absolutely fantastic to have an F 2.8 lens.

I usually try to shoot with this lens at around f4 to f8 to focus on more things.

It definitely helps to keep things in focus and those apertures but being a wide-angle lens.

It isn’t too hard to keep things in focus.

Having the F 2.8 aperture has definitely saved my ass many times low for daytime shots in dark environments.

If you’re a real estate photography professional or a wide-scale wide-angle or landscape or architectural professional, the Olympus 7-14 millimeter, Pro is a completely legitimate professional series lens for micro four thirds.

And really for just about anybody who’s considering a career in real estate photography.

I do love this lens because even though it does weigh quite a bit, I do love it.

It’s still balanced and worked very nicely on my own crane v2, using the GH4.

In my opinion, it is an absolutely amazing lens.

It’s a little bit expensive, but the build quality of the lens, the way it works, all that stuff is just amazing.

Because it’s for the micro four-thirds system, It is quite hard to get wide-angle lenses on those because your focal length is effectively doubled because of the crop that Micro 4/3 cameras apply.

So these 7-10-millimeter lenses said in the review are equivalent to a 14 to 28-millimeter lens on a full-frame camera, so you’re doing something like this to get really wide.

You get a bit of what’s called at the widest range, you get a bit of distortion, but it’s pretty easily corrected in a post, so no big deal there.

I thoroughly recommend this lens 100%; it’s just been a lifesaver for me; it’s got me so much work.

It’s definitely paid itself off for me by now. And yeah, I highly recommend this lens.

And really, for just about anybody who’s considering a career in real estate photography.

Olympus 7-14mm F2.8 Lens: (Best Olympus lens for real estate photography)

Pros
  • Extremely sharp.
  • Fixed f/2.8 aperture.
  • Really nice for low-light situations.
  • Excellent image quality.
  • Weather sealed.
Cons
  • Bit of distortion
  • Dim corners at f/2.8.
  • Little bit expensive

Laowa 7.5mm f2: (Best Cheap Micro Four Third Lens)

This is 7.5 millimeters F2 lenses for micro four-thirds. It is my absolute go-to lens for real estate.

Let’s talk about a few things that I really love about this lens.

One of the first things is the size. How small this thing is one of the reasons that I got into Micro Four Thirds in the first place was because of the size of the bodies and the lenses.

It also means that it’s incredibly lightweight, and that’s what I love.

I run this on a gimbal all the time, and this paired with my GH5 s, gives me unbelievable results from real estate.

Now, although this lens is an f2, I rarely use it at f2 unless I’m really hunting for light. As I said, I use it on my GH5 s with the native ISO.

I don’t tend to go down to f2, but sometimes I will if I can’t get enough natural light in a property. I normally use this thing at f4, and I find that’s typically where I get the sharpest and cleanest results.

F 4, F 5.6, I believe, is the sweet spot for this lens, and I always use an f4 to focus somewhere near infinity.

When I focus on infinity and actually, it’s not infinity focus, I have to set my lens to slightly before infinity.

So I know that everything is tack sharp.

I also use this for real estate interior photography as well.

Just because it’s a manual lens, there are no electronical parts; it is fully manual, which might put some people off.

But because I know this is a fully manual lens, I can set my focus to exactly where I know I’m going to get the whole room in focus, press the shutter button, and it gives me fantastic photography results as well.

Another thing that I really love about this lens is its all-metal build. I love that it’s not made of plastic, and it feels really sturdy in hand as well.

One thing that video shooters might not love about this lens is that it has a clicked aperture.

Every time you change the aperture on this lens, you’ll hear a noticeable click, and you’ll also feel it on a hard stop.

I really use it for real estate and a couple of other small things where I want an ultra-wide-angle lens.

The lens does come with a lens hood; however, I don’t have it attached to my lens ever because I find that I get slightly getting in the corners with the lens that is attached, so for that reason, I leave it out.

I don’t find that it helps with any sun glare or anything like that on the lens, so I just completely leave the lens but even without the lens hood.

I do you sometimes find that I have to correct the vignette and post.

It’s a slight problem, but it doesn’t really bother me, and it doesn’t stop me from loving this lens the results that I get with it.

All of the positives massively outweigh the negatives, so that I couldn’t recommend it anymore.

If you are looking at getting into real estate videography and you do shoot on the Micro Four Thirds system, personally, I don’t think that there’s a better lens out there for value for money that will give you the same results as this does.

For the size and the way, this thing is absolutely amazing.

There are some flaws with it, especially the Infinity focus and the slight vignette that I get, but overall, I think the results are fantastic for the price I pay for this lens.

And the amount of real estate work that I do with this lens and pay for itself in the first couple of weeks.

So again, if you are looking at getting into real estate videography and photography, do not overlook this lens; it’s a fantastic addition to your kit.

Laowa 7.5mm f2: (Best Cheap Micro Four Third Lens)

Pros
  • Solid build quality.
  • Small, lighter & compact.
  • Best ultra-wide field of view.
  • Best for video.
Cons
  • Some vignette.

Panasonic 10-25 f1.7: (Best Micro four third lens for Video)

Is this the ultimate one lens set up for shooting real estate videos? Here are my thoughts on having used the Panasonic Leica, 10 to 25 F 1.7 lens.

Talking about the ultimate lens or ultimate one lens system fishing real estate stole the video.

Because, of course, it depends on what camera system you use, what other lenses you have, and what style of video you should.

However, this lens comes close to me for shooting real estate styles videos using my Panasonic GH5.

To me, the two most impressive things about this lens that stand out, and there’s the reason why I was really keen to get my hands on one to have a go with.

It’s obviously constant aperture very fast constant aperture f 1.7 through the whole zoom range, and of course, that zoom range of 10 to 25, which and full-frame 35 mil equivalent is 20 to 50 millimeters.

That 35-millimeter zoom range of 20 to 50 millimeters is actually really nice.

When you’re shooting real estate videos, that zoom range is also a fantastic zoom range of a general-purpose wide to much more click range.

And zoom styles of shooting this lens could literally be a one-lens system from many different styles and types of video projects.

It is a large piece of glass. However, the size is not a bad thing, and it is actually a really nice wide and chunky style of lens to put in your hand.

I had a chance to use this lens handheld to run my local town and area, and that is actually a very nice balance in a really nice size that sits in the palm of your hand.

Speaking of stability, this 10 to 25 lens doesn’t have built-in image stabilization. However, the GH5 that I was using with it embodies stabilization.

I had no problems hand-holding and shooting with this lens, even on the long end of the zoom.

That image quality coming out of the lens is, of course, what as I expected it to be perfect in.

Even when I’m putting it side by side with this lens, I couldn’t really pick up a whole lot of difference.

However, the area that didn’t pick a bigger difference is that I can obviously open up the aperture because I have a constant f 1.7.

Even on the long end of the zoom on this lens, I can open up with 1.7, Where is the long end of this lens is f4.

So if you, after that shallow depth of field or constant chided for the field, then that is a fantastic lens for doing that.

So most importantly, how was the lens use? And I had the chance to use this lens on an actual paid real estate video shoot.

And so it was a fantastic time to test it and put it through its paces.

As expected, it was very nice to use.

And I loved having the large diameter controlled zoom focus and aperture.

Which are all very nice to use, and your bigger lenses and bigger controls and the video world are often a lot nicer to use because you have a lot more control fine control on the lenses, and they feel a lot more positive in hand.

It’s very nice to use and very convenient to use when shooting a real estate video job.

I said on the 10 mils or the very wide end of the lens for most of my interior shots and then switched it up or zoomed in to the 25 mils for picking up-close details.

And again, as I mentioned earlier, even on the 25 mils zoomed-in into the lens, you still have the opportunity to use an F 1.7 To get this lovely soft depth of field if you’re picking up detail shots.

A couple of things that you may need to be aware of if you’re considering this lens.

Due to its larger size and weight, and if you’re shooting predominately on a handheld gimbal, you will need to check your camera and lens weight or that your gimbal store handles your camera and lens combined flight.

And often, when you’re shooting real estate, lenses, such as this, I can actually go to 8 or 9 miles, which is even wider, and then onto the wall and help you out in tiny spaces.

It’s the ultimate lens for shooting real estate videos.

To me, this lens was designed with the more serious video professionals.

Panasonic 10-25 f1.7: (Best Micro four third lens for Video)

Pros
  • Excellent colors & contrast
  • Really nice zoom range.
  • Impressive image quality
  • Dust & splash sealing resistance.
  • Best for videography
Cons
  • Pricey
  • Big & heavy

CONCLUSION:

Alright, guys, so that concludes all the lenses we will talk about today in this article.

Do you guys have any experience with these lenses? What are your thoughts on them?

Which is the Best Micro Four Third Lens For Real Estate Photography for you?

Is there a lens that I didn’t mention in this article that you love to use for real estate photography?

Would you please leave your thoughts and comments below?

Related Posts:

5 Best Lens For Real Estate Video:

7 Best wide-angle lens for real estate photography:

6 Best Focal Length for Real Estate Photography:

5 Best Lens For Real Estate Photography Crop Sensor:

6 Best Full Frame Lens For Real Estate Photography:

5 Best Lens For Indoor Real Estate Photography:

 

Leave a Comment