So you already decided, or you’re deciding on starting a real estate photography videography business.
What is the reason why we even need this Micro four-third lens?
Which is the best micro four-thirds lens for real estate photography?
If you are starting in the real estate photography business, you’re probably wondering which lenses you should use.
I ran into that problem the same when I first started.
So let me show you some best micro four-thirds lenses for real estate photography.
Let’s drive in:
Which is the Best Micro Four Third Lens For Real Estate Photography?
Here are my recommended top 4 Best Micro Four Third Lens For Real Estate Photography:-
|Image||View on Amazon||Best Micro Four Third Lens For Real Estate Photography|
|View on Amazon||Laowa 9mm f/2.8: (Best Ultra-Wide Micro Four Third Lens)|
|View on Amazon||Olympus 7-14mm F2.8: (Best Olympus lens for real estate photography)|
|View on Amazon||Laowa 7.5mm f2: (Best Cheap Micro Four Third Lens)|
|View on Amazon||Panasonic 10-25 f1.7: (Best Micro four third lens for Video)|
My favorite lens for the APSC system, whether you use Sony micro 4/3 or even Canon.
So this lens is super small; it stands for zero distortion, which is incredibly sharp.
This lens has single-handedly been the biggest reason I have not jumped to a full-frame camera for real estate work; I just haven’t needed it.
Even if it’s 4 millimeters on a full-frame, that’s almost too wide, and in most houses, there is such a thing as too wide, and it looks distorted to the eye, and it doesn’t look all that appealing.
But this lens looks excellent in houses, opening up tiny houses and making them look much more significant.
Also, I love using this in bathrooms, tight spaces, and laundry rooms.
Tight, narrow kitchens do a great job of opening up the shot.
It works great for photos and videos.
However, taking photos with this is a manual lens, so you must ensure you set your focus ring to infinity.
The same thing with video aperture goes from F 2.8 to F 22, so you get a wide array.
I have noticed a little vignette at F 2.8, but it’s not that hard for me to correct and post. Pulling it back and feathering it, I can clean it up.
I noticed no vignettes and photos, which is essential because that’s where most of your real estate photography will happen.
They do include a lens hood with this unit. However, I just found that the lens hood is sort of cheap.
Overall, the build quality is excellent; it’s all made of metal and doesn’t weigh much.
It’s also a tiny lens that can fit almost any little pocket of your bag or kit.
And it’s super easy to balance on a gimbal which I appreciate. The most challenging problem is that I don’t have a lens.
After using it for a year, happy with its purchase.
I like shooting Sony specifically because the color science is okay; it’s great.
And the fact that it does so well in low light in a lot of these rooms.
I can bump the ISO up high to 2000 sometimes and not get any noise, which to me is tremendous.
If you shoot on the micro four-thirds system, they have the 7.5 millimeters broken on F2.
It’s an F 2.8, but that also offers zero distortion, but they have the nine-millimeter available for Canon and Fuji, so no matter what you shoot on.
I’ve had this lens for quite a while and am just reviewing it now.
And the reason I originally bought this lens was to do some real estate videography and photography.
So this is good for landscapes but excellent for real estate photography and videography.
Olympus 7 to 14 millimeters, f 2.8 weighs around 534 grams, so it isn’t heavy.
But it has a nice feel and builds quality; this lens features a zoom range from 7 to 14 millimeters.
The Olympus 7-14 millimeter f 2.8 Pro takes image quality to another level, specifically in crucial areas.
The thing is sharp from edge to edge.
Although it isn’t perfect, it has far fewer chromatic aberrations, and Olympus handles flare considerably better than the Panasonic.
So it is a pretty wide-angle lens.
It has a constant aperture of 2.8, which is lovely for those low-light situations.
So I went with this one at its widest angle of 7 millimeters.
It does have a bit of distortion but nothing too crazy that can be fixed in the post.
I must admit, though, when using this lens, I used it most of the time at around 8 or 9 millimeters, which is about 16 millimeters to 18 millimeters, the Full Frame equivalent.
I did this to avoid as much distortion as possible if I had to. Did I shoot at its widest focal length?
I never really noticed any chromatic aberration or vignetting with this lens and found it very sharp, even though having an F 2.8 lens is fantastic.
I usually try to shoot with this lens at around f4 to f8 to focus on more things.
It helps to keep things in focus and those apertures but being a wide-angle lens.
It isn’t too hard to keep things in focus.
Having the F 2.8 aperture has saved my ass many times low for daytime shots in dark environments.
Suppose you’re a real estate photography professional or a wide-scale wide-angle, landscape, or architectural professional, the Olympus 7-14 millimeter.
In that case, Pro is an entirely legitimate professional series lens for micro four-thirds.
And really, for just about anybody considering a career in real estate photography.
I love this lens because even though it weighs quite a bit, I love it.
It’s still balanced and worked very nicely on my crane v2, using the GH4.
In my opinion, it is a fantastic lens.
It’s a little bit expensive, but the build quality of the lens, the way it works, and all that stuff are just excellent.
Because it’s for the micro four-thirds system, It is pretty hard to get wide-angle lenses on those because your focal length is effectively doubled because of the crop that Micro 4/3 cameras apply.
So these 7-10-millimeter lenses said in the review are equivalent to a 14 to 28-millimeter lens on a full-frame camera, so you’re doing something like this to get wide.
You get a bit of what’s called at the widest range and a bit of distortion, but it’s pretty easily corrected in a post, so no big deal.
I recommend this lens 100%; it’s just been a lifesaver for me; it’s got me so much work.
It’s paid itself off for me by now. And yeah, I highly recommend this lens.
And really, for just about anybody considering a career in real estate photography.
This is 7.5 millimeters F2 lenses for micro four-thirds.
It is my absolute go-to lens for real estate.
Let’s talk about a few things that I love about this lens.
One of the first things is the size. How small this thing is, one of the reasons that I got into Micro Four Thirds in the first place was because of the size of the bodies and the lenses.
It also means that it’s incredibly lightweight, which I love.
I run this on a gimbal all the time, and this paired with my GH5 s, gives me unbelievable results from real estate.
Although this lens is an f2, I rarely use it at f2 unless I’m hunting for light. As I said, I use it on my GH5 s with the native ISO.
I don’t tend to go down to f2, but sometimes I will if I can’t get enough natural light in a property.
I usually use this thing at f4, and I find that’s where I get the sharpest and cleanest results.
F 4, F 5.6, I believe, is the sweet spot for this lens, and I always use an f4 to focus somewhere near infinity.
When I focus on infinity, and it’s not infinity focus, I have to set my lens slightly before infinity.
So I know that everything is tack sharp.
I also use this for real estate interior photography as well.
Because it’s a manual lens, there are no electrical parts; it is entirely manual, which might put some people off.
But because I know this is a fully manual lens, I can focus on where I know I will get the whole room in direction, press the shutter button, and it also gives me fantastic photography results.
Another thing that I love about this lens is its all-metal build.
I love that it’s not made of plastic and feels sturdy.
One thing that video shooters might not love about this lens is that it has a clicked aperture.
Every time you change the aperture on this lens, you’ll hear a noticeable click and feel it on a hard stop.
I use it for real estate and a few other small things where I want an ultra-wide-angle lens.
The lens does come with a lens hood; however, I don’t have it attached to my lens ever because I get slightly in the corners with the attached lens, so I leave it out for that reason.
I don’t find it helps with any sun glare or anything like that on the lens, so I leave it entirely, even without the lens hood.
Do you sometimes find that I have to correct the vignette and post?
It’s a slight problem, but it doesn’t bother me, and it doesn’t stop me from loving this lens and the results I get with it.
The positives massively outweigh the negatives, so that I couldn’t recommend it anymore.
If you are looking at getting into real estate videography and you do shoot on the Micro Four Thirds system, I don’t think there’s a better lens out there for value for money that will give you the same results as this does.
For the size and the way, this thing is fantastic.
There are some flaws with it, mainly the Infinity Focus and the slight vignette I get, but overall, I think the results are fantastic for the price I pay for this lens.
And the amount of real estate work I do with this lens pays for itself in the first couple of weeks.
So again, if you are looking into real estate videography and photography, do not overlook this lens; it’s a fantastic addition to your kit.
Is this the ultimate one-lens setup for shooting real estate videos? Here are my thoughts on using the Panasonic Leica 10 to 25 F 1.7 lens.
Fishing real estate stole the video about the ultimate lens or one-lens system.
Because, of course, it depends on your camera system, other lenses, and what video style you should use.
However, this lens comes close to me for shooting real estate-style videos using my Panasonic GH5.
The two most impressive things about this lens stand out, which is why I was keen to get my hands on one to have a go with.
Its constant aperture high-speed constant aperture of f 1.7 through the whole zoom range, and of course, that zoom range of 10 to 25, which and full-frame 35 mil equivalent is 20 to 50 millimeters.
That 35-millimeter zoom range of 20 to 50 millimeters is excellent.
When you’re shooting real estate videos, that zoom range is also a fantastic range of a general-purpose wide to much more click range.
And zoom styles of shooting this lens could be a one-lens system from many different styles and types of video projects.
It is a large piece of glass. However, the size is not wrong; it is a friendly wide, chunky style of lens to put in your hand.
I had a chance to use this lens handheld to run my local town and area, and that is a lovely balance in a nice size that sits in the palm of your hand.
Speaking of stability, this 10 to 25 lens doesn’t have built-in image stabilization.
However, the GH5 that I was using with it embodies stabilization.
I had no problems hand-holding and shooting with this lens, even on the long end of the zoom.
That image quality coming out of the lens is what I expected it to be perfect.
Even when putting it side by side with this lens, I can’t pick up a lot of difference.
However, the area that didn’t pick a more significant difference is that I can open up the aperture because I have a constant f 1.7.
Even on the long end of the zoom on this lens, I can open up with 1.7, where the long end of this lens is f4.
So, after that shallow depth of field or constant chided for the area, that is a fantastic lens.
So most importantly, how was the lens used?
And I had the chance to use this lens on a paid real estate video shoot.
And so it was a fantastic time to test it and put it through its paces.
As expected, it was very nice to use.
And I loved having the significant diameter-controlled zoom focus and aperture.
These are all very nice to use, and your bigger lenses, more extensive controls, and the video world are often a lot nicer to use because you have a lot more control over the lenses, and they feel a lot more positive in hand.
It’s adorable to use and very convenient to use when shooting a real estate video job.
I said on the ten mils or the wide end of the lens for most of my interior shots, then switched it up or zoomed in to the 25 mils for picking up-close details.
And again, as I mentioned earlier, even on the 25 mils zoomed-in into the lens, you still have the opportunity to use an F 1.7 To get this lovely soft depth of field if you’re picking up detail shots.
You may need to be aware of some things considering this lens.
Due to its larger size and weight, and if you’re shooting predominately on a handheld gimbal, you will need to check your camera and lens weight or that your gimbal store handles your camera and lens combined flight.
And often, when you’re shooting real estate, lenses such as this, I can go to 8 or 9 miles, which is even more comprehensive, and then onto the wall and help you out in tiny spaces.
It’s the ultimate lens for shooting real estate videos.
To me, this lens was designed with the more severe video professionals.
Alright, guys, that concludes all the lenses we will discuss today in this article.
Do you guys have any experience with these lenses? What are your thoughts on them?
Is there a lens I didn’t mention in this article that you love using for real estate photography?
Would you please leave your thoughts and comments below?
I am a Professional and Certified Digital Photographer born in the USA. I have been in this field of photography for 22 years, and in these years, I have used many photography lenses and Cameras, which I want to share here on this website about my experience. The idea for Bestoflens.com is to provide honest information about different Lenses and Camera products in the format of a “Best lenses for AYZ” list. I want this website to be the last destination for people to pick the best Cameras and lenses to fit their needs. You can find our unbiased reviews here on Bestoflens.